Category: Eat, Drink, and Move That Body!

A new report suggests that while many women are getting the HPV vaccine, the ones who need it most are not:

The new HPV vaccine, which protects against viruses that cause most cervical cancers, has been a commercial success for manufacturer Merck, with worldwide sales last year of $1.4 billion. But some doctors now question whether the vaccine has been overpromoted to affluent women who need it least instead of patients most at risk of dying from the disease.

[snip!]

Women who die from the cancer tend to be poor women without access to routine medical care that allows doctors to find and remove growths before they turn malignant….

So the women who are at greatest risk of dying are the women least likely to be vaccinated. The root cause of both “greatest risk” and “least likely to be vaccinated” is that these women don’t have access to routine medical care. And no news reporting, no PR blitz, no advertising is going to change the fact that if someone has a hard time getting together the money for a doctor’s visit and a pap smear, they are going to have a hard time getting together the money for a doctor’s visit and a set of vaccinations that is sometimes not covered by insurance.

Oh, and one more thing. Those of us who can afford a pap smear may find that the lab went ahead and did an HPV test too. That’s a nice little extra fee for the lab that you’ll be paying (at the very least you’ll cough up a co-pay) on a test you didn’t even ask to have done.

In Closing: not sure what to make of 90 salads in 90 days; how did the nurse coming to your home to see how you and the baby were doing turn into government agents invading your home?; for those still unclear on the subject, why the public option is important; [gulp] structural unemployment to be high for the next decade; clothing so complicated you need a class or an expert to help you out; man’s life ruined over breath mints; too big to fail must die; famous last words, why oil won’t go back to $100/barrel; old fashioned judge insists on stuff like due process, cause, and warrants, why not powdered wigs too?; and Forbes gets it wrong again, getting a cooking style mixed up with an illegal drug.

I am a purist about cocktails, for the most part. As far as I am concerned, a “martini” comes in two flavors: Gin or Vodka. You won’t catch me drinking apple-tinis, choco-tinis, berry-tinis, kalhua-tinis, mocha-tinis, tini-tinis, or any other abomination served in a cocktail glass ending in tini. The plain, simple, unembellished martini was good enough for James Bond (although strictly speaking in the novel it was a Vesper), and it’s good enough for me. 

That being said, when exactly did the “cocktail menu” become the “martini menu”? Who decided that “random alcohol or mixer plus vodka equals some kind of martini”? When is the Screwdriver going to be rebranded as the orange-tini? And I hate to ask, will it sell better?

I don’t begrudge anyone their frou-frou cocktail, their “sex on the beach” or “woo woo cocktail” or whatever they want to call it. I’ll just usually order something simpler. 

But herein lies the problem.  I know exactly what to expect when I order a “Tanqueray Martini, Up, Olives.” Likewise, I know what I’m getting if I order just a “vodka martini with a twist.” If I order a “Makers Mark Manhattan,” I know that in many places I had better specify “up”, or it will come on the rocks, which isn’t bad, just different. Some people look at me twice when I order a Manhattan. Apparently that’s “an old lady drink” — perhaps they are thinking of Winston Churchill’s mother.  By the way, a Manhattan can be greatly improved with sweet vermouth and/or a splash of Cointreau. 

Where I get into trouble is ordering a “cosmo“. What I am expecting is a drink containing cranberry juice, some sort of citrus juice or liqueur, and vodka (perhaps slightly sweetened, as cranberry is rather tart). What I have been served lately varies from that to pink lemonade with vodka, to some sort of cherry kool-aid thing with vodka (this last was so vile I couldn’t drink it and sent it back in favor of a Tanqueray Martini, above). Apparently, I am lucky to have not been served this vodka-sorbet combination from Rachel Ray. What’s next? Calling “Red Bull and Vodka” a cosmo? 

Henceforth, when I get a wild hair for a cosmo, I shall order a “vodka cran” instead, and save myself much grief. 

In Closing: why is Jack Welch afraid of the Obama Administration?; “we’ve got m**** f**** questions on this m**** f**** plane,” a clear security risk for blind men to ask what the heck is going on;  Cheesecake Factory profits are up (on less, booze, more cheesecake. That’s not the right way to “tighten belts”, America!); better fuel efficiency in the works, and now we can’t complain that it will drive the Big 3 out of business because 2 of them are already effectively there; does Pelosi have a target on her back;  health care follow up from Reich; Ezra moved; Wal-Mart sticks a fork in Game Stop, starts buying used games; LEGO USB hubs; and there’s gold (and silver) in them thar hills.

It is my pleasure to inform all ShortWoman readers about the relaunch of Age Against the Machine. The renovated site will feature commentary on nutrition, fitness, anti-aging, and general health. Included will be regular reviews of books, exercise programs, and other products written impartially. Oh, yeah, and I’m one of the writers. Most of the stuff I would have posted in the “Eat, Drink, and Move That Body!” will be over there instead. Come visit us!

In Closing: a lot has been said about health care, health insurance, and reform thereof in the last couple of days; Congressional leaders bowing to credit card companies while forcing the rest of us to kneel and take it; on the reform of No Child Left Behind; Sakura; and “Pull over! Hey Joe, you want a burger?” “Uh sure Barrack, let’s have a burger!” How quickly we forget how much time Mr. Clinton spent at McDonalds.

When I have dinner at a nice restaurant, I can reasonably expect that people at neighboring tables will not be blowing cigarette smoke at me. When I buy a ticket on an airplane, I should reasonably expect to have a seat — a whole seat, without somebody else’s flesh crammed against me.

I have some little stack chairs in my kitchen. They’re not fancy, but they do the job and are easily moved around the house. There is no harm done if a black person, or an Hispanic person, or a Catholic sits on these chairs. Nothing bad will happen if an elderly person or a man or a young child sits on them. However, these chairs would probably break if a 400 pound person were to sit on them. That’s not because they are bad people, it’s just that the chair isn’t designed for them.

Differences in access to the health care system notwithstanding, being a different religion, nationality, gender, or having a different marital status does not automatically put someone at risk for heart disease, dementia, high blood pressure, cancer. None of these things is a leading indicator of diabetes risk. Obesity is a risk factor for all of the above. True, race can be a risk factor for heart disease and cardiovascular disease among other conditions, but some researchers feel that other risk factors (including income) are also at play. Weight loss  in the overweight and obese reduces the risk of heart disease, osteoarthritis, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, some cancers, incontinence, infertility, and diabetes almost universally. This holds true regardless of whether it is done with “diet and exercise,” or more radical interventions such as gastric bypass surgery. 

Yesterday I read two items on civil rights. The first was Sojourner Truth’s brilliant speech on women not being inferior to men, usually known as “And ain’t I a woman?” The other was a Reuters item entitled Obesity becoming U.S. civil rights issue for some.

A civil rights issue? How? I can’t become a man without surgery, I can’t become black, I can’t become Asian. I can learn foreign languages but that will never change my national origin. However, I can control my weight, and I can do it without surgery. I can gain weight; I can lose weight. One is harder than the other I confess, but yet I can.

The only way I can possibly rationalize being overweight or obese as some sort of civil rights issue is if we are going to say that obesity is in fact a handicap, covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Even then, ADA says “reasonable” modifications, and that often modifications must be paid for by the disabled person effected. Why do I have the nagging feeling that won’t be acceptable to the “fat acceptance” crowd?

Don’t get me wrong, I am not “just bagging on fat people.” There are two points in this article on which I can agree. First, “promoting health at every size” is a good thing. However, every doctor knows that “healthier at a normal size” is a better thing. I reject the idea that “fat is my normal.” To accept that means you accept that humans are rapidly evolving to be heavier, with weaker hearts, brains, joints, and pancreases. You aren’t going to get Marcus Welby to “tolerate” the fact that these people are more likely to get chronic illnesses — don’t even get Dr. House started (no really, I can’t stand him). Granted, the medical community often has not done a great job helping these people, but the “fat acceptance” crowd doesn’t want them to do a better job. They want medical professionals to tell them it’s ok to be fat.

Second, of course everybody should be able to buy clothes that fit and look good on them! Believe me, I know a few things about the difficulties of buying clothes when you don’t perfectly fit the fashion industry’s ideas about your body. Short people and tall people have understood for years that there would be times they had to order things from catalogs, get things altered, or even have things custom made. Welcome to my world, Big Girls! If the fashion industry thinks that the one in 5 American women who are under 5’2″ are not a viable market, I don’t know what makes them special. Clothes are not a civil rights issue.

Over the years, I have known many overweight or obese people who were smart, hard working, funny, and great to be around. But if they are on a plane next to me, they had better stay on their side of the armrest. And when they visit, they better not break my kitchen chairs.

In Closing: HFCS; B of A’s Judgement Day; the first swine flu death was a tax inspector who probably knocked on 300 doors while ill; huh, Reagan thought torture was a bad thing (an inconvenient truth indeed); oh no, Steve Jobs is too sick to attend a hearing regarding his property;  and maybe the bank’s pain should be spread around.

Or, Thoughts on Swine Flu and a Possible Pandemic Thereof.

There is growing concern about a swine flu outbreak in Mexico that has already crossed the border into our country. Dozens of cases in the States and more overseas have been confirmed. Preliminary reports seem to indicate that there may be a higher than typical death rate from this strain (this may be caused by economic factors rather than some greater virulence). Official CDC updates are available via Twitter.

An additional cause for concern is the level of preparedness in this country. Since some sources say we have a shortage of doctors in even the best of times, this could be a really big deal. Of course it doesn’t help that pandemic preparedness funds were opposed by certain Republicans. Oh, and a few Dems. I guess they don’t understand that the rain falls on the good and the bad alike — and more to the point rich people get sick too. 

Oh, and this could adversely impact the economy, too. As if we need more problems. 

The CDC is advising people to take the same normal precautions they would take against colds and flu:  wash your hands; stay home if you are sick; don’t send sick kids to school.

On a happier note, mambo! Oink, Oink!

In closing:  Sorry kid, talk to the King about changing your name to Sonic when you turn 18; and City Shrinkage.

Long time readers know that I lost a lot of weight, kept it off, and that I work out. If you aren’t familiar with the story, here’s Obligatory Diet Posts Part One and Part Two. 

I’ve done a lot of different workouts over the years. I change up either to stave off boredom, to get around a plateau, or to achieve a certain fitness goal. I’m still generally a fan of Joyce Vedral. I still recommend military workouts because they work and require almost nothing in the way of equipment. I’ve also done a few taped workouts. For example, there was this Denise Austin video that just made me have unhealthy thoughts about her continued well being. There was this somewhat harder Pilates video (I bought all the hype about Pilates being all about strong core without bulk, and I have a tendency towards bulk); at least I wished the trainers no violence. There’s a Tai Chi with Kickboxing workout featuring Janis Saffell and Scott Cole — he’s nice to look at! —  but the first time I tried to do it there were so many interruptions that I took it as A Sign. There was also Nancy Marmorat’s Daily Exercise Routine, which really wasn’t bad at all, especially for flexibility.

For a while, my exercise partner and I have discussed the idea of a hard-core boot-camp style workout such as Tony Horton’s P90X. You’ve seen the infomercial, right? Who doesn’t want to look like that! However, it’s hard to plan to devote 45-90 minutes a day for 90 days, and it was even harder to figure out where we could mount a chin-up bar or find space/equipment for both of us to work out at the same time. Luckily, Tony had a solution for us! 

We ordered 10 Minute Trainer last summer and started within days of receiving it. Yeah yeah it’s got an infomercial too. Each of the workouts is 10 minutes of actual work and probably 12-13 minutes of run-time (and another couple minutes of commercials for the other Beachbody products). Make no mistake, he works your butt off for 10 minutes, and yes I mean that literally. The workouts are Cardio, Abs, Lower Body, Total Body, and Yoga/Flex. All the equipment you really need is one of those resistance bands, (one is included) although a mat is also very good to have. You can do one, two, or three routines daily. We did 2 daily and were generally pleased with the results. 

Even so, it was time to rev things up.

Last week, we began ChaLEAN Extreme, from Tony’s colleague Chalene Johnson. Chalene’s thing is free weights, although the workouts can be done with bands. Specifically, the principle is to work the heck out of your muscles with relatively heavy weights such that you can only reasonably do 10-12 reps of any given exercise. It is a progressive, 90 day program that gives you roughly 2 days off per week. I like the integrated warm-up and cool-down. A group of 4 people show you a variety of skill/strength levels, including tips for those who aren’t very strong yet. There’s a mid-week interval training block that I suspect won’t be so bad once I’ve actually learned the moves (I found it rather awkward). The beginning level ab routine is a bit tame compared to Tony’s. There is an upgraded routine that I will probably sub in next week. I am pleased with how certain things are shaping up so far. Really, the weight routines are pretty good (with the universal caveat that you have to watch your own form).  [More]

However, I was sorely disappointed with the “Recharge” workout, described as “an invigorating flexibility workout.” Despite her claim at the beginning of the routine that flex is an important and often overlooked part of fitness, it feels like an afterthought. It is roughly 25 minutes long, but baby-steps of flexibility. She talks over and over about how many people have problems with stiff hamstrings, and then she does things  that are unlikely to make them more flexible — wrong stretch, too little time, too much movement. Several of the “modified” versions for the less flexible are completely ineffective if not actively counter-productive. Some of the yoga poses are not as I have ever seen them before. Chalene clearly doesn’t beleive there’s anything to yoga beyond some funny stretches. If this is your only stretching routine, you are unlikely get more flexible. 

Tony Horton said in the introductory materials to p90x that “[I’m not strong] because I do a bunch of pull-ups. I’m strong because I do yoga.” After we finished Chalene’s workout, we did Tony’s 10 minutes of yoga. It felt really good. 

*** UPDATE ***: I have gotten a personal reply from Chalene herself, recommending “Full Body Flexibility” by Jay Blahnik. Her stance on flexibility among the Joe and Jane Average crowd are reflected in this work. It is clear that the ChaLEAN Extreme flex workout is aimed at someone with more “average” flexibility, which is odd because I always considered myself something of a “Johnny Stiffguy”. As with the entire workout series, to get the best improvement you are going to need to push yourself as hard as you can every time you work out. While I will absolutely stick with the weight routines, I will probably go back to Tony for yoga. Also worth noting that 4 new routines are under development.

In Closing: oops, he had the wrong kind of anthrax after all; when it comes to health insurance “reform”, who do you trust?; contractors continue a 200+ year tradition of bilking the military and short-changing our troops; I am unclear how bankruptcy judges can really do their jobs if they can’t address the single biggest asset and debt the people before them have; how to merely sound Japanese; and Cat Sanctuary.

For those of you not in the know, “BBW” stands for “Big Beautiful Woman“.

I’m really not sure what to make of this item from Reuters via Yahoo:

A new program developed by the U.S. government is tackling the obesity epidemic by helping “tween” girls and their parents make small but important changes to build a healthier lifestyle.

[snip]

Girls 9 to 13 years old who are overweight or obese are referred to BodyWorks through their pediatrician, or by word of mouth. Parents and caregivers attend 10 weekly 90-minute sessions, and girls are expected to show up for at least three. The goal is to give parents and caregivers “hands-on tools to make small behavior changes to prevent obesity and help maintain a healthier weight,” according to the BodyWorks Web site (http://www.womenshealth.gov/bodyworks/).

“The very attractive aspect of it is that it addresses the whole family, and the whole environment in the household, which I think is the best approach to childhood obesity,” said [Pediatrician Dr. Monica] Richter. “Diet implies a short-term deprivation, which doesn’t work.”

[snip]

The goal is not for girls to lose weight…, but for families as a whole to begin making healthier choices at the grocery store, to become more active and to spend less time in sedentary activities like watching TV or playing computer games.

Ok, so let me give points for recognizing that diet alone is not the answer. More points for involving the whole family in the plan. Being overweight or obese puts people at risk for a number of life-shortening problems and some other problems that reduce quality of life as well, so helping them lose weight is a pretty good goal. But I have to take points away for targeting just girls in just this specific age range.

What? Boys don’t get fat? Girls aged 9-13 don’t have enough body image issues? They weren’t fat when they were younger? These young ladies don’t have chubby siblings and parents who could stand to lose a few pounds?

In closing: tips for better blogging; careful about shifting to the “center” Senator, because it’s further to the left than most people think; it turns out treating pregant women for their addiction problems is better for everybody in the long run; nice to see that at least some laws apply to Blackwater; and last, there will probably not be a lot more entries in the “Picture This” category. Those strange things I run across will be submitted to the new and improved Groundmeat.

It has come to my attention that it’s been 10 years since Jared Fogle lost 245 pounds eating Subway sandwiches. And surprisingly enough, it wasn’t a publicity stunt. He was a regular guy who was tired of being fat. In fact, Subway Corporate originally saw him “as an oddity, not an opportunity.”

Hey, man, congrats! I guess he’s joined me as a “literally a freak of nature.”

I’d like to take a few minutes to talk about some of the things Jared did right, and point out a few things he could have done better. For those of you just joining me, let me briefly present my diet credentials: my personal weight loss story; and some of my evolving ideas about diet and weight management.

Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that someone very special is going to be looking over this post very critically, a doctor who specializes in weight and age management here in Las Vegas.

So what did Jared do right?

He came to his own decision to lose weight. His mom, coach, or girlfriend did not cram down a diet on him. He wasn’t carrying anybody else’s baggage about body image, only his own conviction that something had to change. He, on his own, got tired of the fact that “My shoulders would hurt. My knees would hurt. My wrists would hurt. And that was not even when I was in motion.” There is unfortunately something true to the joke about how many psychiatrists it takes to change a light bulb — only one, but the light bulb has to want to change.

He was an adult when he began to diet. Not to discount the terrible problem we have with childhood obesity in this country, but it sure does seem like the vast majority of the people who say diets don’t work have somewhere in their story a sentence like “I went on my first diet when I was 13.” Or 11. Or 16. Many of these diets were enforced by well meaning parents who were honestly trying to help their kids not be little fatties (see previous point). These people may indeed be right about one thing: diets don’t work for them. On one hand, we could use some research on the long term effects of diet on adolescents. On the other hand, I fear for the kids in the test group.

He limited calories, but to a sustainable level. He went from eating “sometimes, 10,000 calories a day” to eating about 2000 calories a day. I think all of us can live on 2000 calories a day for quite a while, and if we do it sensibly we can do it without feeling hungry all the time. This was not a severe calorie restriction diet of under 1000 calories a day.

It was a diet he could keep doing day after day. He lived practically next door to the Subway. It didn’t involve strange foods that were hard to get or difficult and time consuming to prepare. If he went away, there would still be a Subway nearby. If not, he could figure out how to make a sandwich on his own. And really, if he got tired of the turkey sub, he could have had the ham, or the roast beef, or a salad.

It was a (relatively) balanced diet. There’s plenty of veggies on top of a sandwich from Subway, along with a reasonable portion of bread and enough protein to keep you going. Protein is really important on a diet.

He cut added sugar. He didn’t have the cookie with his sandwich, although he did have the baked potato chips. He stopped putting 10 packets of sugar in his morning coffee. He switched to diet soda. Frankly, just the changes in his beverage habits alone probably took 500 calories off his daily intake! Which would you rather have, 500 calories of soda or 500 calories of sandwich?

Once he was physically able to, he added an exercise component to his diet. Sure, it started with some walking. And then a lot of walking. It would not surprise me for his workout to have evolved a bit over the last 10 years.

He wasn’t obnoxious about it. The story goes that “former dorm mate of Fogle, Ryan Coleman, wrote an article about Fogle’s weight loss story after Coleman ran into Fogle and hardly recognized him because of the lost weight.” He wasn’t beating his chest over being on a diet. Heck, he was embarrassed to be that heavy and once said “I had no intention of anyone ever finding out what I had done.”

He didn’t give up. Sandwiches are not the first thing Jared tried, just the most successful thing. To the best of my knowledge — and I have not read his book — he has never discussed some of the strategies that failed. He does point out that some things work better for different people.

He didn’t go back to the way of eating and living that got him fat in the first place. Make no mistake, Jared doesn’t just eat subway sandwiches anymore. But he’s not eating 10,000 calories a day. He’s happy to be where he is, and happy to be helping other people too. I suspect that he still does watch what he eats and that he exercises. He can certainly afford a personal trainer to help with that now.

Nevertheless, there are some things he could have done better.

He skipped breakfast. Just adding a piece of fruit first thing in the morning would have stimulated his metabolism. Some experts recommend eating 5 healthy but snack-sized meals instead of 3 regular meals for just this reason.

He didn’t have a support group. Most people don’t have the inner strength to go it completely alone the way Jared did. Most of us need somebody rooting for us — or at the very least not actively working against us! Even if it’s just one trusted friend or your spouse or your doctor, somebody to help you and sometimes keep you accountable is a good thing.

Most of us would prefer more variety. Don’t get me wrong, Subway has a lot of different sandwiches, but it wouldn’t surprise me if Jared reached a point where he didn’t particularly ever want to see another sub again.

That’s it.  There have been some advances in weight loss and a bunch of research since Jared lost all that weight, but a lot of what he did is still something doable and worth doing.

On this, the 100th International Women’s Day, 1000 Afghan women gathered to “laugh and sing for the future”. A Saudi woman drove, in violation of national law. Canadian women marched in parades and went to rallies. There were demonstrations in Paris. Protests in the Philippines. Calls to end corruption in Bangladesh. There were other events in such nations as Australia, North Korea, and Iraq. There was even an article in the L.A. Times.

Yeah, not a lot of coverage here in the States.

So on this 100th International Women’s Day I am answering the call of several women bloggers: the call for the 10 most essential items in my closet! Clearly this is an issue of great importance — particularly considering my place in the world of Short Women — and I will not let you down.

1. Jeans that fit properly. First, they need to be the right length. Every time I see a woman with her jeans dragging on the ground I want to shake her and ask why she wasted her money on clothes that don’t fit right. Did she think she was going to grow 4 inches suddenly? I know there is a lot of disagreement about this, but I think they should come roughly to the tops of your shoes. And furthermore, you should not have to wear high heels with jeans. They’re jeans for crying out loud. As for the waist, wear what you like with these two caveats: nobody wants to see your crack; and muffin-top is never sexy.

2. Black pants, again that fit properly. Currently, slim pants are the thing. Someday maybe they won’t be. That’s fine, because you’ll wear these often enough to wear them out over the course of a few years. Khakis are great too but not as versatile; you can’t dress up khakis enough for a dinner party. Mine happen to be hip-huggers, meant to be capris but they fit me like pants, purchased at Kohls. They do not have to be expensive, just nice looking.

3. Black Skirt, roughly knee length. In a nice fabric, and a cut that flatters your body type. And oh yes, it must absolutely be machine washable. Wear it to work. Wear it to parties. Wear it to events. Wear it wherever. I have both a knee length one and a mini.

4. Underwear that is both comfortable and flattering. There’s something empowering about knowing that even your panties look gooooood. Just ask Juliette.

5. A “Yes, I’m in charge here” dress. Mine is a navy blue shirt-dress that comes just above my knees, purchased at Forever 21.

6. Turtleneck or mock turtlenecks, your choice of sleeve length, at minimum off-white and basic black. Other colors are optional and welcome. Mine are elbow length and great solo or layered. Because I am Short, I have trouble finding long sleeved shirts that aren’t actually finger-length shirts.

7. Something to layer over other things. This is an issue of personal style, and what is acceptable in your workplace. Maybe you’re a cardigan kinda person. Perhaps you prefer a sharply tailored blazer. Or maybe you re-purpose a traditional women’s dress shirt that turned out to be a little bigger that you thought it would be when you ordered it….

8. A nice-looking but comfortable machine washable dress. Or two. This is a matter of personal style, but it should be something that you wouldn’t feel funny going directly from work to a social event or picking up something at the grocery store on the way home.

9. The Shoes! Now there’s no real reason to go shoe mad. Really. But there’s some things every woman ought to have. At least basic black pumps or flats that go with the pants and skirts above, and something that coordinates with browns. Mine are leopard print! And I shouldn’t have to say you need some comfy around-town walking sort of shoes. If you do a lot of traveling, you need these to be slip-on to facilitate the Safety Dance at the airport.

10. A couple bits of distinctive but not necessarily expensive jewelry. Something that says who you are. It doesn’t have to be big and certainly shouldn’t be gaudy, but it should be something that goes with the majority of your wardrobe. A strand of genuine faux pearls? Cubic Zirconia earrings? A particular pendant or bracelet? It’s up to you.

That’s it. It’s my personal opinion so take it or leave it. Keep in mind that my fashion goals are modest: to never appear as a Glamour Magazine “Don’t”, and to be neither the best nor worst dressed woman at any formal event.

In closing: we are no longer able to hide job losses; interesting piece on teachers pay; the current health insurance debate is “like watching two rocket scientists boil a discussion of space travel down to a squabble over the angle of re-entry”; what was Playmobil thinking (I mean really, everyone knows the shoes have to come off!); um no, the actual data from that meta-study shoes shows that modern anti-depressants do work in a statistically significant way; how many of the 50 most powerful blogs do you read?; the Grand Canyon is even older than we thought; perfect storm of economic indicators and mortgage meltdown; even the FBI is investigating Countrywide; and Brilliant Jill is much more thoughtful than I am, because instead of 10 wardrobe essentials she wrote about 10 things that Yes, We Can Do.

Somehow, my browser tabs have become clogged with food-related items. If you are on a diet you might scroll down….

Let’s start with a cocktail, shall we? Wired has a helpful item on how to infuse your own Vodka with your own selection of delicious flavors. Take that, Absolut!

Perhaps we should have some light dinner conversation. Here’s a book we could discuss: Swindled talks about the various ways that the food business has taken advantage of us, the customers, for the last few thousand years!

Speaking of which, Suburban Guerilla would like to talk about why it’s so hard to get locally grown food at the local megamart.

Shall we finish the appetizers with a cheese plate? Unbossed would like to know why, if rBST is sooooo good for cows and not at all bad for us humans, farmers and dairy producers don’t proudly label products with its use?

Are you a fan of Lilek’s Gallery of Regrettable Food — even if you can’t stand his standard blog drivel? Well then you are going to love this. It’s the Mid-Century Supper Club, reproducing food your mother still has nightmares about, and sharing the pictures with us on the internet! Many thanks to Slashfood for this one.

Ever wonder what foreigners buy at Japanese discount stores? Well it turns out that Ramen tops the list. Followed by an amazing array of strange stuff, some of it even edible!

And did you know that now some people are claiming that fortune cookies are a Japanese invention?

Speaking of Japan, they are a little upset to be getting “free” beef from America. It seems they have very strict criteria regarding what they will accept from our nation, and at this point I can’t blame them.

After all, stuff like this shows up in our freezers.

And the USDA isn’t interested in the *ahem* wrong people investigating the wrong things. The “wrong people” such as Congress. The “wrong things” such as whatever they say. Yeah. Cause they totally have nothing to hide.

In closing: Education is about Students; Off With My Sexist Head!; Gretchen embraces reality as we know it; “We can’t show kids the results of non-abstinence, it goes against the principles of abstinence-only sex education!”; and $31 Million dollars worth of goods lost stolen from luggage while in TSA or airline custody in the last 3 years .