If you were to randomly come across a commentary entitled “Stop Supporting a Tainted Food Supply,” where would you suppose you were? Alternet? PETA? Some random editorial that happened to get picked up by Buzzflash?
How about financial news site TheStreet.com?
After giving us the quickie-version of the latest massive meat recall — which the USDA says shouldn’t concern us because most of the meat has already been eaten and what we don’t know can’t hurt us — the author tells us:
I’m taking a stand and putting my money where my mouth is — literally. My five-person family consumes about $1,300 of food per month — $15,600 per year — including the meals we eat at home and at restaurants. I can easily divert at least a quarter of that money to farmers and meat producers in my own community.
Now, just as a point of curiosity, how is that going to help? Even if we go out on a limb and assume that her community has farmers and meat producers that sell locally, what guaranty does the author have that locally produced food is free of the problems of corporate farming? Just because it’s local doesn’t mean that the animals have been humanely treated, or that the vegetables are free from contaminants, or that any of it has been handled in a sanitary fashion. Even the most vile of factory farms and slaughterhouses are “local” to somebody.
Ah, now here’s someone who has a grip on the problem: the Faithful Penguin points out the false premise that “the markets are a regular libertarian paradise of goodwill and bonhomie where no capitalist would dare engage in shoddy or dangerous practices because the market would ‘self-regulate;’ therefore, no rational businessman would take those risks as they’d be run out of business.” In fact, he reminds us that the current regulations — the ones that have been systematically undermined since the Reagan Administration — were passed into law in 1906, after “Upton Sinclair published The Jungle. Written to awaken the consciousness of America to the plight of immigrant workers, the horrific and dangerous conditions in Chicago’s slaughterhouses were exposed, causing the public to worry about its own health.”
In the end, that is what regulation is supposed to do: protect us from the excesses of unbridled corporatism. Some people say regulation costs jobs. I say deregulation has cost a lot of jobs in such diverse areas as air travel (bankrupt airlines), telecommunications (bankrupt providers like WorldCom), energy (bankrupt and corrupt companies like Enron), and food production (family farms). Sure, some regulation goes overboard, and some other regulation is actually a gift to the industry being “regulated,” but a whole lot of it is reaction to somebody somewhere saying “there oughta be a law.”
In closing: stock market danger; sign this stack of papers, including the one that lets your tax preparer sell your returns; make your own ginger beer; Iron Chef or Not Iron Chef; I’m late to the coverage, so I’ll let Jill say “duh” on late diagnosis of cancer; Duhpartment of Research tells us men can live longer by “abstaining from smoking, weight management, blood pressure control, regular exercise and avoiding diabetes” (anybody know how to avoid diabetes? “weight management”, “regular exercise”, and have the right relatives!); the “education gap” and social mobility; awesomely elegant wrapping; why doesn’t the border fence go across the golf course?; Word to Mrs. Clinton, it’s not that you’re a woman, it’s that you’re you!; thanks to Pharyngula for pointing out 41 hilarious science experiments; and strange economic portents, economic indicators will no longer be published due to budget constraints, and the attack of the expanding dollar menu.
Cross-posted at The Moderate Voice.